Most Recent Publications

 

Absenteeism – it was only one day!

By Thabang Rapuleng, Director and Tamsanqa Mila, Associate, Employment Law, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

 

In Litha Malimba v Sun International Management Limited and others, JR1594/18 (delivered 23 January 2021), the Labour Court was called to decide whether an employee’s failure to report for duty – for one day – warranted a dismissal.

 

Mr Litha Malimba (Mr Malimba) was employed as a dealer. On 26 January 2018, the employee reported for work without his staff ID card. He was requested to go home to fetch his staff ID card and return to work the following day.

 

On 27 January 2018, the employee failed to report for work and did not inform management. The purpose of the rule was to ensure that the employer makes timeous alternative if an employee is unable to report for duty. The employee was charged with absenteeism and he was dismissed.

 

Unhappy with the outcome, the employee referred an unfair dismissal dispute to the CCMA challenging the fairness of his dismissal. He was not successful at the CCMA and he launched a review application at the Labour Court.

 

At the Labour Court, Mr Malimba argued that dismissal was not the appropriate sanction and was unreasonable considering the nature of the misconduct. In his analysis, Tlhotlhalemaje J noted the following:

 

  • the offence of absenteeism requires fault on the part of an employee. In this case, the employee did not report for duty on 27 January 2018 and he did not inform management;

  • the employee was on a final written warning for absenteeism;

  • the employee refused to sign a document authorising the employer to dock his salary for one day; and

  • discipline is management prerogative and it is the employer’s right to deal with the offence as it deemed fit.

 

Ultimately, the court considered the employee’s lack of honesty, accountability and multiple prior written warnings and dismissed his review application.

 

This case demonstrates that absenteeism is ser ious misconduct and depending on the facts of the case, may warrant a dismissal.

 

For more information please contact Thabang Rapuleng at or Tamsanqa Mila at

Article published with the kind courtesy of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Courses and Workshops

 

                   

 

AARTO and the Impact on Your Business

07 May 2021 (09:00 - 12:00) (Fully Booked)

Interactive Online Course

21 May 2021 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

Basic Labour Relations

13 May 2021 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

POPIA: Protection of Personal Information Act

14 May 2021 (09:00 - 12:00) (Fully Booked)

Interactive Online Course

28 May 2021 (09:00 - 12:00) (Fully Booked)

Interactive Online Course

04 June 2021 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

Managing Poor Performance/ Incapacity

20 May 2021 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

20 May 2021 (08:30 – 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Management and Leadership Skills

26, 27 & 28 May 2021 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Managing Day to Day Issues/ Problem Employees Full day workshop

27 May 2021 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Employment Equity Committee Training

28 May 2021 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

COVID-19 Workplace Compliance Health, Safety and Claims Management Course

03 & 04 June 2021 (08:30 - 13:00)

Inter active Online Course

Health and Safety Representative and Committee Training Course

10 June 2021 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

 

 Our Clients 

 

Android App On Google Play

Android App On Google Play