Most Recent Publications


Is the BCEA now trending in dismissal disputes?

By Aadil Patel, Director, Anli Bezuidenhout, Senior Associate and Rowan Bromham, Candidate Attorney, Employment Law, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr


The recent judgment handed down by the Labour Appeal Court (LAC) in Pilanesburg Platinum Mines v Lisebo Lerato Pearl Ramabulana concerned an appeal against a decision of the Labour Court in which it was found that the employer had breached the employee’s contract of employment by failing to comply with the provisions relating to termination. The employee (applicant) brought an application to the Labour Court in terms of section 77 of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, No 75 of 1997 (BCEA) in terms of which the applicant sought inter alia a declaration that the termination of her employment was unlawful and that the respondent had failed to comply with provisions of the contract of employment.


The Labour Court found in favour of the employee and the employer subsequently appealed against this finding.


The LAC stated that in seeking relief in terms of the BCEA and in not approaching the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), the Respondent had renounced all reliance on the Labour Relations Act 55 of 1995 (LRA). The respondent had therefore relied on contractual law, as opposed to equity and fairness.


The case illustrates the recent trend where it appears to have become fashionable for dismissed employees to approach to the Labour Court in terms of the BCEA and claim for breach of contract seeking either specific performance or damages. There does not seem to be a clear reason that has given rise to this, but the risk associated with claims made in terms of the BCEA, as in this matter before this Court, is enormous. Firstly, unlike in the LRA, the claimant must prove an unlawful breach and not unfairness for the termination of the employment; next in terms of the LRA, reinstatement is generally compulsory where a dismissal is found to be substantively unfair, specific performance consequent upon a breach is not, and generally it is a discretionary relief.


Furthermore, in terms of the LRA, an employee whose dismissal is found to be unfair will receive compensation. In an action in terms of section 77 of the BCEA, if the employee is able to prove a breach by the employer, the only amount s/he will receive is the loss s/he has proved to have suffered as damages. Here s/he must also show that they have tried to mitigate the damages. There is also no way s/he can receive damages equal to the amount they would have earned from the date of the breach to the date that they would eventually have retired.


This absurd prayer, which seems to have become a regular occurrence in dismissal disputes, takes leave of the basic rule that one is awarded damages that are proved and not what the employee would have been paid had he/she remained in the employer’s employ until retirement.


The LAC also found that an employee cannot merely state that because the terms of the employment agreement prescribe a process for termination, non-compliance with those terms constitutes a breach of the agreement. In relying upon this argument, the employee is required to show that the preconditions required for the employer to comply with the clauses of the agreement were present. In this regard, the judgment highlights the fundamental importance of pleading your case correctly as an applicant must stand or fall by his or her pleaded case. Failing to place reliance on the correct preconditions and authorities when seeking specific remedies, denies clients the right to such remedies.


For more information please contact Aadil Patel at [email protected] or Anli Bezuidenhout at [email protected]

Article published with the kind courtesy of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr








Courses and Workshops



Managing Poor Performance/ Incapacity

10 February 2022 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

POPIA: Protection of Personal Information Act

11 February 2022 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

Workplace Discipline and Dismissal

18 February 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Employment Equity Committee Training

18 February 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Management and Leadership Skills

23, 24 & 25 February 2022 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

24 February 2022 (08:30 – 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Basic Labour Relations

25 February 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Strategic Human Resources Management (HRM) and - Business Partnering

02, 03 & 04 March 2022 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Health and Safety Representative and Committee Training Course

03 March 2022 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Workshop Chairing Disciplinary Hearings

10 & 11 March 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course


 Our Clients 


Android App On Google Play

Android App On Google Play