Home

The Employment Equity Amendment Bill and the New Employment Services Bill – Public Comments Now Due

By Johan Botes

Director in the Employment practice at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

Parliament’s portfolio committee on labour has released the Employment Equity Amendment Bill (EEAB) and the Employment Services Bill for public comment. When these bills come onto law they will have a significant impact on how employers conduct their business. The public has been invited to provide written submissions on the Bills by no later than 14 December 2012.

“Among the many changes made to the current Employment Equity Act, No 55 of 1998, the EEAB introduces a new form of unfair discrimination,” says Johan Botes, Director in the Employment practice at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr.

“This will regulate situations where different employment conditions are applied to different employees who do the same or similar work (or work of equal value). Unless the employer can show that differences in wages or other conditions of employment are, in fact, based on fair criteria such as experience, skill and responsibility, such conduct will constitute unfair discrimination,” he explains.

Botes says that with regard to affirmative action, the Labour Department (Department) will now have increased powers to fine companies who do not comply with their employment equity obligations. The quantum of fines will be increased and may now also be determined by making reference to the employer’s annual turnover.

“Furthermore, the group of people who benefit from affirmative action will now be limited to persons who were citizens of South Africa before the democratic era (or would have been entitled to citizenship, but for the policies of apartheid), and to their descendants. This means that the employment of persons who are foreign nationals, or who have become citizens after April 1994, cannot assist employers to meet their affirmative action targets,” he explains.

Mark Meyerowitz, an Associate in the Employment practice, says that the amendments will also affect a company’s use of contract workers.

“In line with proposed amendments to the Labour Relations Act, No 66 of 1995, employees who are placed with a client by a Labour Broker for longer than six months will be deemed to be employees of the company for the purposes of affirmative action.

He says that the Employment Services Bill is a new government initiative that will set up a public 'employment services agency', and will also provide for the regulation and registration of private employment services agencies.

“These agencies are not labour brokers but institutions that will provide job seekers with certain services such as matching job seekers with available work opportunities, registering job seekers, job vacancies and facilitating other employment opportunities. The Bill will also set up a nationwide database to monitor employment and assist with government’s goal of creating more jobs, decent work and sustainable livelihoods,”  Meyerowitz adds.

For more information please contact Johan Botes, Director, Employment practice, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, (011) 562 1124 or email:

Follow this link to download the EMPLOYMENT EQUITY AMENDMENT BILL

Case Law Summaries and Articles

 

Can employees be dismissed for refusing to accept new terms and conditions of employment?

Can an employer dismiss employees because they refuse to agree to a change to their terms and conditions of employment? An initial answer may be, “yes”.

Read More >>>

 

Escape route: “Resignation with immediate effect”

The latest case in the ‘disciplining employees who have resigned with immediate effect’ saga has brought about more uncertainty as to whether an employee who resigns with immediate effect shortly before a disciplinary hearing can avoid disciplinary action and subsequent dismissal.

Read More >>>

 

Freedom of expression or incitement to commit an offence? A constitutional challenge

On 4 July 2019, the North Gauteng High Court handed down judgment in the case of The EFF and other v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and other (87638/2017 and 45666/2017) in which the EFF and Julius Malema (the applicants) sought to have s18(2)(b) of the Riotous Assemblies Act, No 17 of 1956 (Riotous Act) declared unconstitutional.

Read More >>>

 

Consolidated, comprehensive or general final written warnings

Regarding dismissal, according to the Code of Good Practice, “the courts have endorsed the concept of corrective or progressive discipline. This approach regards the purpose of discipline as a means for employees to know and understand what standards are required of them.

Read More >>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Courses and Workshops

 

                   

 

   

 Our Clients 

 

Android App On Google Play

Android App On Google Play