Strategic Human Resources Management (HRM) and - Business Partnering


Transforming HRM to a Virtual Strategic Performance Advisor (VISPA) in a Post Covid-19 Employment Era



3 Days Interactive Online Course



11, 12 & 13 November 2020 (08:30 - 16:00)



Online Booking Form



Click here to download registration forms for 11, 12 & 13 November 2020 (08:30 - 16:00): Interactive Online Course



  Download Brochure


Facilitator: Charles Cotter (PhD)




Key Performance Area (KPA) 1: Strategic HRM & HRBP – Principles, Practices and Processes

  • Module 1: Defining the fundamental SHRM concepts

  • Module 2: Understanding the context and environment and the impact of Covid-19 on HRM in 2020 and projected to the future

  • Module 3: Exploring the unique challenges of a virtual/remote working culture

  • Module 4: Diagnosis (health check) and gap analysis of current, industry wide Strategic HRM practices

  • Module: 5: Building a strategic business case for SHRM today and tomorrow (future-proofing)


Key Performance Area (KPA) 2: HRBP, Future Fit Competencies and Transformation to VISPA

  • Module 6: Interrogating the relevance of Ulrich’s model of the 4 strategic HRM roles

  •  Module 7: Defining and implementing the strategic value proposition and contribution of HRBP in 2020 and beyond

  •  Module 8: Business executives’ expectations and priorities of HRBP’s

  •  Module 9: Enablers and critical success factors to transitioning, transforming and re-positioning to a Virtual Strategic Performance Advisor (ViSPA) model

  •  Module 10: Applying the 5-step ViSPA strategy 


Key Performance Area (KPA) 3: HRM Governance – Proactive and Reactive Tools

  • Module 11: Applying HRM Risk Management – principles, tools and process

  • Module 12: Applying HRM Auditing – tools, process and principles to measure the value and impact of the ViSPA model


Key Performance Area (KPA) 4: Business, Performance and HRM Intelligence 

  • Module 13: SHRM Performance/Business Intelligence (Metrics and Analytics) – generating real-time predictive analytics and business and performance intelligence

  • Module 14: Generating a SHRM Scorecard


Key Performance Area (KPA) 5: Workplace Advocacy

  • Module 15: Transitioning from a High Performing Organization (HIPO) to creating a Virtual Performing Organization (VIPO) culture

  • Module 16: Employee Engagement and Talent Retention strategies in a post Covid-19 employment era


Key Performance Area (KPA) 6: Integration and Application

  • Module 17: Reading article and Case study


Who should attend?

  • HR Directors

  • Managers and –Professionals

  • HR Business Partners

  • HR Specialists and Practitioners

  • HRM administrators and -generalists, supervisors and line/senior managers and any staff member tasked with the HRM, people and/or talent management responsibility.


Learning Outcomes

  • On completion of this online learning programme, learners will have:

  • An in-depth understanding of strategic HR management and virtual strategic performance advising; performance/business intelligence; employee engagement and future focused HRM value chain best practice processes and strategies.

  • Learners will also master the ability to harness these SHRM processes to optimize their strategic impact and value.


Level of Learning Programme

  • Advanced



  • R 5950-00 (incl. Vat) per delegate

  • Price includes course material, certificates, legislation


For further information contact:

  • Hanlie or Peraldo at telephone (012) 661 3208

  • Email: 




Online Booking Form


Click here to download registration forms for 11, 12 & 13 November 2020 (08:30 - 16:00): Interactive Online Course








POPI and consent - don’t get caught in your own net

By Gillian Lumb, Director, Kara Meiring, Candidate Attorney, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr


2020 has given rise to many challenges for employers. The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPI) poses yet another challenge. Employers have a grace period of one year as of 1 July 2020 within which to ensure their compliance with POPI. 


POPI distinguishes between the collection, storage and processing of personal information and special person information. Special personal information includes e.g. an employee’s race or ethnic origin, health or sex life, religious or philosophical beliefs and trade union membership. Securing an employee’s consent is one of the basis on which an employer can lawfully process both general and special personal information of its employees.


It is crucial for employers to understand the meaning and interpretation of consent within the context of POPI. While employers may hope for a “quick fix” to ensure compliance and trust that including a broad, “catch all” consent in employees’ contracts of employment will be suffice – this may not prove to be adequate in every instance. A general consent may be sufficient to cover some of the personal information that will be processed during the course of an employee’s employment, however employers should be aware of the risks associated with relying on blanket consents in every instance. 


Section 1 of POPI defines consent as “any voluntary, specific and informed expression of will in terms of which permission if given for the processing of personal information”. Written consent is not expressly required. However, it will be for the employer in its capacity as responsible party to show that it has secured an employee’s consent where it is relying on consent. In the circumstances it is advisable for employees’ written consent to be secured. 


The requirement that consent be voluntary, specific and informed means that there should not be any pressure or force placed on an employee to consent. The employee should also be sufficiently aware of the content of the processing given the requirement that the consent is informed.


The Information Regulator has yet to give guidance on the interpretation of consent in terms of POP. In all likelihood it will have regard to the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) which requires that the consent is unambiguous and must be given by a clear affirmative act. It may well be that the Information Regulator interprets consent restrictively in keeping with the GDPR.


In the circumstances clauses relating to the processing of personal information in employees’ contracts of employment which are aimed at securing employees’ consent to the processing, should at minimum set out the nature and scope of the personal information that is to be processed, the reason for the processing, consent to further processing, consent to collection from a source other than the employee and consent to the transfer of the information. The employees must be able to understand in clear language what they are consenting and the extent of the consent. Where necessary provisions should also be made specifically for the processing of special personal information.


Employers should bear in mind that POPI does not demand consent in every instance and that processing may take place without consent where e.g. the processing is required in terms of law, or for the purposes of protecting a legitimate interest of the employee.


Employers will need to determine on a case by case basis whether the processing which they wish to conduct falls within the scope of the consent which they may have secured from an employee in his or her contract of employment or whether they will need to rely on one of the other basis set out in POPI. 


Both special and general personal information may be processed lawfully if the processing is necessary for the “establishment, exercise or defence of a right or obligation in law”. This would cover instances where e.g. an employer processes employees’ personal information to comply with its obligations under the Employment Equity Act.


An employer can process general personal information without an employee’s consent where such processing either protects a legitimate interest of the employee, or is “necessary for pursuing the legitimate interest of the responsible party or of a third party to whom it is supplied”. While the term “legitimate interest” is not defined in POPI, it is likely that the Information Regulator will seek guidance from the GDPR in this regard. The GDPR has established a three-pronged test in interpreting “legitimate interest” which considers purpose, necessity, and balance. It first asks, “Is there a legitimate reason or purpose for the processions?”, secondly “Is processing the information necessary for that purpose” and thirdly “Is the legitimate interest overridden by the interests of the data subject?


A determination is made as to whether there is a “legitimate interest” for the purposes of processing personal information based on the answers to these three questions.


So as not to fall foul of the provisions of POPI it is recommended that employers develop internal policies that will assist them in determining whether in each instance, personal information to be processed is covered by the general consent clause in an employee’s contract of employment alternatively, by one of the other basis for lawful processing. In the absence thereof, the employer will need to prepare and secure a further consent from the employee.


For more information, please contact Gillian Lumb at   

Article published with the kind courtesy of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr






Courses and Workshops




The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

03 December 2020 (08:30 – 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

 Our Clients 


Android App On Google Play

Android App On Google Play