Discipline and Dismissal

Ivan Israelstam

 

There is a serious misconception that employers may not get external experts to chair disciplinary hearings.  It is true that such experts might, under certain circumstances not be allowed to represent the employer (or the employee). 

 

However, the person chairing the hearing is not representing either of the parties. Instead, the chairperson is there to gather the facts provided by both parties and to make a fair decision, which could go either way. In the case of Khula Enterprise Finance Limited vs Madinane and others (2004, 4 BLLR 366) the Labour Court found that it was not unfair for an external legal expert to chair a disciplinary hearing.

Not only is it perfectly fair and legal for an external expert to be asked to chair the hearing, it is also desirable because:

  • An external person will be less susceptible to influence from the parties than would an internal chairperson;
  • An expert in labour law will have the experience and skill to run the hearing according to the very complex requirements of the laws of evidence;
  • Such an expert would be able to arrive at a fair decision without breaching the myriad of complex principles that the CCMA expects to be applied.


A great many employers have had their dismissal decisions overturned at the CCMA, not because the dismissal was considered inappropriate, but because the chairperson, an internal employee or manager was unskilled in the chairing of hearings.

Schedule 8 of the Labour Relations Act (LRA) requires that the employee be allowed the opportunity to state a case in response to the allegations.

The courts have consistently interpreted the latter requirement to mean that the accused employee must be given the right to an unbiased chairperson, to testify, to bring documents, call witnesses and cross examine evidence brought against him/her.

The question then is how can an employer provide for these legal rights without setting up a proper enquiry with a fully-skilled chairperson and prove that all these rights have been afforded to the employee without taking proper minutes?

To ensure that the employer complies with the employee's rights and in order to be able to prove such compliance, the employer has no choice but to use a properly skilled chairperson and to set up a formal hearing, the record of which becomes part of the evidence at the CCMA.

In the case of Schoon vs MEC, Department of Finance (2003 Contemporary Labour Law Vol 13 No.4 2003) the High Court of Appeal decided that the chairperson of a disciplinary enquiry cannot rely on the disciplinary code alone but must also take into account the provisions of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2003.

Also, the court decided that the employer's refusal to allow the accused the right to legal representation at an internal disciplinary hearing was unconstitutional.  This startling decision strongly indicates that the courts see internal disciplinary hearings as very formal processes. Furthermore, where an employee is suspected of poor performance it is not enough to have an informal discussion with the employee about the problem and then to fire him/her the next week.

The LRA sets down specific steps to be followed before a dismissal for poor performance can even be considered.  For example, the employee must have received sufficient evaluation, guidance, counselling and training. Even then, the employee's poor performance must have continued after he/she received the said evaluation and guidance.

Furthermore, to justify dismissal, there needs to be an investigation into the alleged poor performance and proof that there is no other way of remedying the performance problem. It is not practical to comply properly with such stringent requirements in an informal manner because informal processes are difficult to control and to prove.

Thus, whether the employee is a probationer, an experienced worker or a senior executive it is far safer to formalise all procedures related to misconduct and poor performance. Also, the officials who carry out the corrective procedure need to be highly skilled in legal procedure in order to make sure that each legal right of the employee is strictly adhered to.

This includes the employee's right to an unbiased chairperson. A presiding officer unskilled in chairing hearings risks breaking rules of impartiality. 


This is likely to destroy the employer's case at the CCMA.

  • Ivan Israelstam is chief executive of Labour Law Management Consulting. Contact him on 082-852-2973 or [email protected]
  • Our thanks to Ivan and The Star newspaper for permission to publish this article

 

Subscribe to our free newsletter

* indicates required
 

By submitting your email address to us, you agree to receive our newsletters and course updates. For more information about how we protect your personal information, click here .

Accredited Training Provider

     

Upcoming Courses

 

Workplace Discipline and Dismissal

07 July 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Health and Safety Representative and Committee Training Course

14 July 2022 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

21 July 2022 (08:30 - 16:00)

Emperors Palace Convention Centre

Basic Labour Relations

15 July 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

New Code of Good Practice: Harassment in the Workplace New Course

15 July 2022 (09:00 - 12:00)

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

Chairing Disciplinary Hearings

21 & 22 July 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management (Legal Liability) 

28 July 2022 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

29 July 2022 (08:30 – 16:00)

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre 

Managing day-to-day challenges in the workplace

28 July 2022 (09:00 - 15:30)

Interactive Online Course

The Basic Conditions of Employment Act and Related Workplace Policies New Course

29 July 2022 (08:30 - 12:30)

Interactive Online Course 

 

August

New Code of Good Practice: Harassment in the Workplace New Course

04 August 2022 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

Trade Unions in the Workplace

05 August 2022 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

Managing day-to-day challenges in the workplace

12 August 2022 (09:00 - 15:30)

Cape Town: Protea Hotel Tyger Valley

The formulation of disciplinary charges Online Course

12 August 2022 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

Chairing Disciplinary Hearings

18 & 19 August 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment Course

18 August 2022 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Shop Steward Training

19 August 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course 

How to win an unfair dismissal case at the CCMA / Bargaining Council

25 August 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Managing Poor Performance/ Incapacity

25 August 2022 (09:00 - 13:00)

Interactive Online Course

Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Course

26 August 2022 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

 

September

Retrenchments Simplified

02 September 2022 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

Introduction to Mediation New Course

08 September 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Basic Labour Relations

09 September 2022 (09:00 - 16:00)

Cape Town: Protea Hotel Tyger Valley

Negotiation Skills New Course

22 September 2022 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

 

Our Clients