Conditions of Employment


Illness of a new-born baby entitles a mom to time off so she can care for the child

By Ivan Israelstam


Pregnant employees are strongly protected under existing South African labour law. There are no fewer than six pieces of legislation that require employers to treat pregnant and post-pregnant employees with the greatest of care. One of these pieces of legislation is the Code of Good Practice on the Protection of Employees During Pregnancy And After the Birth of a Child.

The code, issued in terms of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA), is aimed at protecting pregnant and post-pregnant employees. The code obliges employers to:

  • Encourage women employees to inform the employer of their pregnancy as early as possible so as to ensure that the employer can assess risks and deal with them
  • Evaluate the situation of each employee who has informed the employer that she is pregnant.
  • Assess risks to the health and safety of pregnant or breast-feeding employees within the workplace
  • Implement appropriate measures to protect pregnant or breast-feeding employees
  • Supply pregnant or breast-feeding employees with information and training regarding risks to their health and safety and measures for eliminating and minimising such risks
  • Maintain a list of jobs not involving risk to which pregnant or breast-feeding employees could be transferred.


Employers should note that even where an employee who has already given birth is 100% well, the illness of the newborn baby entitles the employee to get time off to look after the child.  In the case of De Beer v SA Export Connection cc t/a Global Paws (2008, 1 BLLR 36), the employee gave birth to twins and took one month's maternity leave by agreement.

As the babies were both ill by the time the one-month maternity leave period was up, the mother applied for another month off. The employer granted her only two more weeks' leave and, when she did not return to work thereafter, she was dismissed.

The employee referred the matter to the Labour Court claiming that the dismissal was automatically unfair because she had been fired for reasons related to her pregnancy. That is, Section 187 of the Labour Relations Act (LRA) classifies a dismissal as automatically unfair if the reason for the dismissal was related to the pregnancy of the dismissed employee.

The employer argued that the illness of the children did not relate to the pregnancy. It argued that the phrase in the LRA "reasons relating to pregnancy" refers to the mother herself and not to the new- born children.

The Labour Court decided that:

  • the phrase in the LRA "reasons relating to pregnancy" refers not only to the mother herself but also to the new-born children and to the mother's right to nurture them,
  • the agreement entered into by the parties limiting the maternity leave to one month was null and void,
  • the employee was legally entitled to take the remainder of her maternity leave to look after her babies,
  • the dismissal was automatically unfair,
  • the employer was to pay the employee 20 months' remuneration in compensation plus the legal costs of the employee.


The BCEA gives employees only three days per year paid leave to attend to family responsibility problems such as sick children. In the De Beer case the employee was not given permission to be off from work after her extra six weeks' leave were up.

It is possible that the employer believed that it had been generous enough in giving the employee substantially more leave than the three days allowed under the family responsibility leave section of the BCEA.

However, the court found that the employee did not need specific permission to be off work because looking after newborn babies falls under maternity leave (not under family responsibility leave or any other type of leave).

Working mothers are automatically entitled to four months' maternity leave. This applies even if the employee has contractually agreed to take less than the four months she is entitled to. The reason for this is that any agreement that is contrary to the law is an invalid agreement.

Due to the substantial legal protections of pregnant employees, employers cannot afford to treat them as they believe is fair. Instead, employers need to utilise the services of labour law experts to devise and implement detailed strategies for ensuring the welfare of working mothers and for minimising the effect of motherhood on workplace productivity without breaking the law.

  • Ivan Israelstam is chief executive of Labour Law Management Consulting. He can be contacted on 011-888-7944 or via e-mail at
  • Our appreciation to Ivan and The Star newspaper for permission to publish this article

Case Law Summaries and Articles


Can employees be dismissed for refusing to accept new terms and conditions of employment?

Can an employer dismiss employees because they refuse to agree to a change to their terms and conditions of employment? An initial answer may be, “yes”.

Read More >>>


Escape route: “Resignation with immediate effect”

The latest case in the ‘disciplining employees who have resigned with immediate effect’ saga has brought about more uncertainty as to whether an employee who resigns with immediate effect shortly before a disciplinary hearing can avoid disciplinary action and subsequent dismissal.

Read More >>>


Freedom of expression or incitement to commit an offence? A constitutional challenge

On 4 July 2019, the North Gauteng High Court handed down judgment in the case of The EFF and other v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and other (87638/2017 and 45666/2017) in which the EFF and Julius Malema (the applicants) sought to have s18(2)(b) of the Riotous Assemblies Act, No 17 of 1956 (Riotous Act) declared unconstitutional.

Read More >>>


Consolidated, comprehensive or general final written warnings

Regarding dismissal, according to the Code of Good Practice, “the courts have endorsed the concept of corrective or progressive discipline. This approach regards the purpose of discipline as a means for employees to know and understand what standards are required of them.

Read More >>>







Courses and Workshops




Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Course

22 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

12 September 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani Towers: Durban

Employment Equity Committee Training

23 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

29 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

30 August 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

27 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

04 October 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani: Durban

Shop Steward Training

28 August 2019

Emperors Palace Convention Centre

Basic Labour Relations

04 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

13 September 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani Towers: Durban

19 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

28 November 2019

Protea Hotel By Marriott Tyger Valley: Cape Town

Managing Day to Day Issues/ Problem Employees Full day workshop

20 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

27 September 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment Course

18 October 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

21 November 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Stay Easy: Cape Town

Workshop Incident/Accident Investigation Course

25 October 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

22 November 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Stay Easy: Cape Town


 Our Clients 


Android App On Google Play

Android App On Google Play